<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Commenting Etiquette: To Approve or Not To Approve…?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/</link>
	<description>ProspectMX, LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:49:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Watson &#124; Womenwise Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Watson &#124; Womenwise Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Well, I automatically delete anything that has to do with gambling, cheap prescription drugs or penis enlargement. But the Askimet Wordpress plugin in usually does that for me, so I haven&#039;t had to worry about it much.

It also remembers people whose comments I have approved in the past, and automatically approves their next comments. That&#039;s a really nice feature as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I automatically delete anything that has to do with gambling, cheap prescription drugs or penis enlargement. But the Askimet Wordpress plugin in usually does that for me, so I haven&#8217;t had to worry about it much.</p>
<p>It also remembers people whose comments I have approved in the past, and automatically approves their next comments. That&#8217;s a really nice feature as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Conklin</title>
		<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Conklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6#comment-277</guid>
		<description>It does now!  Good call, Justin... thanks for noticing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does now!  Good call, Justin&#8230; thanks for noticing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bentz</title>
		<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6#comment-276</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I already assumed our comment filters required the e-mail address. Don&#039;t most of those do that these days? Guess we&#039;re gonna have to get on that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I already assumed our comment filters required the e-mail address. Don&#8217;t most of those do that these days? Guess we&#8217;re gonna have to get on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Seibert</title>
		<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Seibert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6#comment-275</guid>
		<description>1 more question - sorry to be so quick on the submit trigger today - why don&#039;t you require at least an email, if for no other reason than slightly curbing spam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 more question &#8211; sorry to be so quick on the submit trigger today &#8211; why don&#8217;t you require at least an email, if for no other reason than slightly curbing spam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Seibert</title>
		<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Seibert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Ha!  Big oops - was trying to get out the door to an appointment.  I agree with you agreeing with me that it shouldn&#039;t have been posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  Big oops &#8211; was trying to get out the door to an appointment.  I agree with you agreeing with me that it shouldn&#8217;t have been posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Lichty</title>
		<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Lichty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting in your 2 cents on the topic.

Buuut, if we went by your rules, we may not have approved your comment - there&#039;s no name or email associated!  LoL.

I know that my own personal preference is to allow even anonymous comments IF they add something to the conversation in a respectful manner, whether they are critical or an agreement.  If they&#039;re just to get a rise out of people...well, I&#039;m not a big fan of internet drama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting in your 2 cents on the topic.</p>
<p>Buuut, if we went by your rules, we may not have approved your comment &#8211; there&#8217;s no name or email associated!  LoL.</p>
<p>I know that my own personal preference is to allow even anonymous comments IF they add something to the conversation in a respectful manner, whether they are critical or an agreement.  If they&#8217;re just to get a rise out of people&#8230;well, I&#8217;m not a big fan of internet drama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prospectmx.com/blog-commenting-etiquette-to-approve-or-not-to-approve%e2%80%a6#comment-272</guid>
		<description>@Ashley -

Nice post.  There are exceptions to everything, but generally here are some rules I typically try to follow or recommend following to bloggers:

- Allow comments from anonymous parties as long as they give an email address (NOTE: about 99% of the time I post with my full name, so something I&#039;m recommending to blog administrators, not commenters)

- Don&#039;t allow total spam and links.  Dangerous precedent.

- Be transparent and face up to the bad.  The conversation can (and usually does) happen somewhere else.

- If you delete or edit a comment, it better be because it&#039;s in clear violation of your rules.  If in clear violation of good sense, but your rules aren&#039;t there, add your own comment about why you chose to delete / edit and then update your rules asap.

Good stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ashley -</p>
<p>Nice post.  There are exceptions to everything, but generally here are some rules I typically try to follow or recommend following to bloggers:</p>
<p>- Allow comments from anonymous parties as long as they give an email address (NOTE: about 99% of the time I post with my full name, so something I&#8217;m recommending to blog administrators, not commenters)</p>
<p>- Don&#8217;t allow total spam and links.  Dangerous precedent.</p>
<p>- Be transparent and face up to the bad.  The conversation can (and usually does) happen somewhere else.</p>
<p>- If you delete or edit a comment, it better be because it&#8217;s in clear violation of your rules.  If in clear violation of good sense, but your rules aren&#8217;t there, add your own comment about why you chose to delete / edit and then update your rules asap.</p>
<p>Good stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
